“Styles come and go.Good design is a language, not a style.”Massimo Vignelli
Automated Transcript:
Intern, what an abstract logo. These are just the kind of scratches and scribbles that Earthotage Energy is going to gobble up. Truly we have a client-first mentality here at Arbitrary Design.
Now that your… my logo is ready to be pitched, my assistant tells me there’s some kind of rubric that is part of the ‘evaluation’ portion of your workflow, whatever that means. You wouldn’t want any unfortunate circumstances to arise now would you?
The following Arbitrary Design internal rubric document will help you to evaluate the success of your logo and the argument you have developed to defend it. The rubic is broken into two tables, the first evaluates completion of the logo, the second evaluates your argument.
Criteria | Format | Method | Aesthetic |
---|---|---|---|
Completion
|
|
|
|
Criteria | Exceeds | Good | Needs Revision |
---|---|---|---|
Why should Earthotage Energy adopt your logo?
|
|
|
|
Was the level of grammar and language appropriate for an intern at Arbitrary Design?
|
|
|
|
The persuasive paragraph rubric will translate to a grade of A to A+ if the intern has been assessed at ‘good’ or better in both the argument, and grammar/language rows; however, a grade will not (under typical circumstances) be assigned in the event that the logo has not been completed (as defined by the logo rubric). A lower grade can be negotiated in the event of incomplete work (both logo and persuasive paragraph) in particular circumstances where revision will not be undertaken.